Heinrich v. Martin
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUTZ, Judge.
The defendants are the owners of certain real estate located in McIntosh County, North Dakota. The plaintiff brings this action for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell the land, basing the cause of action on a memorandum, a letter, and partial performance. The defendants raise a number of defenses, including the defense of statute of frauds, alleging that, since the so-called contract is one for the sale of real estate, it is within the provisions of the statute of frauds and not enforceable because there is no sufficient memorandum to take the transaction out of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brey v. TvedtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Goetz v. HubbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Hoth v. KahlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Queen City Lumber Company v. FisherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Rohrich v. KaplanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Management Clearing, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992