Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 12, 2005No. A04-0058 CIV(JWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER FROM CHAMBERS
[RE: Motions at dockets 135, 151, and 163]
SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTIONS PRESENTED
At docket 135 plaintiff Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London (“Lloyds”) moved for summary judgment requesting the court to hold that, as a matter of law, defendants Inlet Fisheries, Inc. (“IFI”) and Inlet Fish Producers, Inc. (“IFP”) (collectively “Inlet”) violated the federal maritime doctrine of ubemmae fidei (“duty of utmost good faith”) by failing to disclose facts material to insurance risk thereby rendering the marine insurance policy issued by Lloyds to Inlet void ab initio. At…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- 11333 Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Scott v. Deerbrook InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. National Union InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
- Maricopa, County of v. Office Depot IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.