Miller v. Prentice
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Monterey County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts-are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
Ejectment. Complaint in the usual form, all the allegations of which are denied by the answer. The demanded premises were state school lands. Plaintiff relies on a certificate of purchase as establishing his title and right to the possession of said premises. The court found for plaintiff, entered judgment in his favor, and denied defendant’s motion for a new trial. From the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. His contention here is,-that he proved on the trial that the land is suitable for cultivation, and that plaintiff had never been an actual settler…
2Cited by3 opinions
- People v. VelasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Belcher v. FarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Boggs v. GaneardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906