Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Lewis County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2006No. 76249-0PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*848¶1 The question presented in this case is whether, under the public duty doctrine, an actionable “special relationship” is created between a member of the public and a government entity when an individual places a “911 call,” identifies the nature of his medical emergency, provides a street address but not his name, and “hangs up” prior to either requesting help or receiving an oral assurance from the operator that medical aid will be dispatched. We answer “no” to that question, concluding that there is neither a statutory nor a common law duty on the part of a county to dispatch medical aid…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stevens CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Cummins v. Lewis CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Washburn ex rel. Estate of Roznowski v. City of Federal WayWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Munich v. Skagit Emergency Communications CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Robb v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API