Legal Opinion
Solem v. Stumes
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 29, 1984No. 81-2149PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
465 U.S. 638 (1984)
SOLEM, WARDEN, SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PENITENTIARY
v.
STUMES
No. 81-2149.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 28, 1983
Decided February 29, 1984
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Mark V. Meierhenry, Attorney General of South Dakota, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Timothy J. McGreevy, by appointment of the Court, 464 U. S. 808, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
2Opinion of the Court · WhiteJustice White
The question in this case is whether Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477 (1981), should be applied retroactively.
I
Respondent, Norman Stumes, was a…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
3Cases cited92 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Kevin Jones, Jr. v. K. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016