Legal Opinion
Zipton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 14, 1990No. A044870PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Connie Zipton (hereafter petitioner), individually and as guardian ad litem for her two minor sons, seeks review of the order of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (hereafter Board) denying reconsideration of the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (hereafter WCJ) who held that petitioner failed to establish the evidentiary foundation necessary to trigger the statutory presumption of industrial causation pursuant to Labor Code section 3212.1. Petitioner contends that the Board erred by not invoking the presumption in her behalf,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Jones v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Saal v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Long Beach v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Riverview Fire Protection District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Reeves v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Beaver v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.