Legal Opinion

State v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1985No. 49004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Appellant appeals a jury conviction for robbery and assault. He was sentenced to serve concurrent 10 year sentences. He raises two points on appeal: (1) that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he had the necessary criminal intent for the conviction of assault, § 565.050, RSMo. Supp.1984, and robbery, § 569.020, RSMo. 1978, when he was not involved in the actual assault or robbery; and (2) that it was error to use the phrase “natural and probable consequence” in the verdict director for assault as that language is not sanctioned by the MAI instruction or the Notes on…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  2. State v. LoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. BriscoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MeuirMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Evans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API