Legal Opinion
People v. Parsons
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1985No. Docket 76081PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Type of Case
2Per curiam
Defendant successfully argued to the courts below that he was entitled to immunity from prosecution because he had been ordered under threat of prosecution to give a statement. The attorney general, on behalf of the prosecution, appeals by leave granted, arguing that defendant was not required to give the statement and therefore is not entitled to transactional immunity.
Applicable Law
MCL 205.3; MSA 7.657(3).
Issue and Decision
Is a person entitled to immunity from prosecu tion under MCL 205.3; MSA 7.657(3) because the person felt compelled to make a statement although there was no…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McIntireMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. CampbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Zynda v. ArwoodDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2016
- People v. SafiedineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Department of Treasury v. Psychological Resources, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.