Legal Opinion

Swafford v. Berry

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 24, 1963No. 20259PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

This action was instituted by Geraldine Swafford and Marion Whittle “representatively and derivately on their own behalf and on behalf of all other stockholders * * * similarly situated,” against William Berry, William Berry, Jr., Gerald Berry and Daniel Berry, a minor, as individual defendants, and Monarch Winter Sports, Inc., as corporate defendant. The parties are aligned here as they were in the trial court and will be referred to as plaintiffs, defendants, or by name.

The evidence disclosed that in 1954 William Berry, Sr., was operating the Monarch Ski Area…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Holmes v. JewettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Dollison v. CookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Gallup v. PringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
  2. Ramacciotti v. Joe Simpkins, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. The Herald Company, (Cross-Appellant) v. Donald R. Seawell, (Cross-Appellees)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Ireland v. WynkoopColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. McGraw v. AndesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API