Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1967No. Civ. 29117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

This is a trip and fall case involving a sidewalk pedestrian and the City of Los Angeles. The action is based on the theory of defendant city’s duty to maintain the sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition. No actual notice of the defect was proved. The lengthy time of existence of the defect (at least from July 1957 to the date of the accident on July 19, 1959) established constructive notice thereof. The defect was not minimal, extending lengthwise some 10'6" and varying in height (or depression) from ½" on the south end to 1 7/16" in the center, to at the north end. (Garber v. City of Los…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crain v. SestakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Chase v. Shasta Lake Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Stack v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API