Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Attorney Doe No. 762
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
APPEL, Justice.
We are called upon to consider whether a witness testifying before the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa is entitled to the presence of counsel. In this case, the commission president entered an order which, among other things, quashed the appearance of an attorney for a witness before the commission. We conclude a person called upon to be a witness before our grievance commission may be represented by counsel for the limited purpose of protecting rights personal to the witness in the proceeding.
I. Factual Background and Proceedings.
A client, Jane Doe, filed a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. IannielloNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James William McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- R.M. v. Supreme Court of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In re BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Attorney Doe No. 792Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Amended July 1, 2016 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Attorney Doe No. 792Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- In the Matter of N.P., Alleged to Be Seriously Mentally ImpairedCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019