Legal Opinion

Kane v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 25, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtG-rason, J.

This suit was instituted by the appellees against the appellant for damages for the taking a piano, alleged to belong to the appellees. The piano was seized by the appellant as sheriff of Baltimore city, under a writ of fieri facias issued upon a judgment in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore city, which had been obtained by F. A. Sharrer & Son against Matthias Roberts. The proceedings show that the debt, for which the judgment was recovered, was incurred in 1812 by Matthias Roberts for a coffin and funeral expenses. It further appears that on the 9th November, 1858, Matthias Roberts and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  2. Moore v. BlondheimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Cooke's Lessee v. KellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beasley v. CogginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Scott v. KeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Horner-Gaylord Co. v. FawcettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Oakford Realty Co. v. BoarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  5. Bauer Grocery Co. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API