Ex Parte Lepf
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court entered in a habeas corpus proceeding in which applicant had sought to prevent his extradition to California. By three points of error, he complains that the trial court erred by not granting him habe-as corpus relief. We affirm.
In Michigan v. Doran, 1 the Supreme Court discussed the purpose of the extradition clause found in the federal constitution and the corresponding duties of the demanding and asylum states. The Court stated that “extradition clause was intended to enable each state to bring offenders to trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Holmes v. KlevenhagenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ex Parte ScarbroughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.