Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lepf

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 14, 1993No. 13-92-529-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court entered in a habeas corpus proceeding in which applicant had sought to prevent his extradition to California. By three points of error, he complains that the trial court erred by not granting him habe-as corpus relief. We affirm.

In Michigan v. Doran, 1 the Supreme Court discussed the purpose of the extradition clause found in the federal constitution and the corresponding duties of the demanding and asylum states. The Court stated that “extradition clause was intended to enable each state to bring offenders to trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. KlevenhagenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Ex Parte ScarbroughCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ibarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  2. Ex Parte Oscar Edgardo Guillen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. Jonathan Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API