Legal Opinion
Keystone Insurance v. Foster
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1990No. Civ. A. 90-0914PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LUDWIG, District Judge.
On February 8, 1990 plaintiff Keystone Insurance Company filed this action in an attempt to preserve the economic benefit of the motor vehicle insurance rate increases it had received just three days earlier from Pennsylvania’s Insurance Commissioner, defendant Constance B. Foster. 1 The complaint asks the court to enjoin the nullification of that rate increase — together with the utilization of the prior rate as a base line for reductions in premium as of July 1, 1990, with no increment before July 1, 1991 —resulting from Pennsylvania’s enactment on February…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Department of InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FosterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Saad Alhiti, Zainab Abduljabbar v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of State, Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Marco Rubio, U.S. Secretary of State, Thomas Barrack, Ambassador of the U.S. at the U.S. Embassy Akara, TurkeyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026