Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thornburg v. Port of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1962Published

1DissentPerry, J.

I am unable to agree with the majority’s views of the law of eminent domain. It should be noted that to reach a reversal of the judgment of the trial court, the majority rely upon the law of nuisance. The majority seem to admit that this has never been the law of this state, but argue that it should be. So far as I have been able to ascertain, no jurisdiction whose constitution reads as does ours has ever sustained such a proposition.

In substance, plaintiffs’ assignments of error are, (1) the trial court refused to submit to the jury as evidence of a taking, evidence that airplanes did travel…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API