Legal Opinion

Mareau v. Vanatta

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

The law that governs a case of this character is plain and well understood. It may be stated in a few words. The owner of domestic or other animals not naturally inclined to commit mischief, as dogs, horses and oxen, is not liable for any injury committed by them to the person or personal property of another, unless it can be shown that he previously had notice of the animal’s mischievous propensity, or that the injury was attributable to some other neglect on his part, it being, in general, necessary, in an action for an injury committed by such animals, to allege and prove the scienter.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keightlinger v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Stumps v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Vrooman v. LawyerNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doe v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Leone v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  4. Ward v. DanzeizenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Fritsche v. ClemowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API