Legal Opinion
United States v. Dan Kendall
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 2, 2006No. 05-2836PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Dan Kendall appeals his sentence by arguing both the district court improperly failed to apply the correct guidelines and the sentence is unreasonable. We reverse and remand for resentencing.
I
Kendall pleaded guilty to knowingly possessing equipment, chemicals, products, and materials used to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(6). He was originally sentenced to eighty-four months imprisonment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) based on his Career Offender status. His Career Offender designation was based on a prior conviction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Darrin Todd HaackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Shelly MashekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Deborah Marie DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Timothy Jerome McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. William J. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Adam RouillardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Mathew Meyer, Also Known as Mathew SalemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.