Borg-Warner Corp. v. Flores
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson
Nearly ten years ago, we observed that asbestos litigation had reached maturity. In re Ethyl Corp., 975 S.W.2d 606, 610 (Tex.1998). Even mature claims evolve, however, and courts have continued to struggle with the appropriate parameters for lawsuits alleging asbestos-related injuries. 1 While science has confirmed the threat posed by asbestos, we have not had the occasion to decide whether a person’s exposure to “some” respirable fibers is sufficient to show that a product containing asbestos was a substantial factor in causing asbestosis. Because we conclude that it is not, we reverse the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Lear Siegler, Inc. v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Plains Exploration & Production Company v. Torch Energy Advisors IncorporatedTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Aransas Project v. Bryan ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.