Legal Opinion
Pavillion Agency, Inc. v. Spitzer
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*627OPINION OF THE COURT
Walter B. Tolub, J.
This court is presented with what amounts to two very unique issues, one which is the subject of the instant application, and one which, while not formally made as part of the instant application, must nonetheless be addressed in order for this court to render a decision.
Petitioner is an entity known as the Pavillion Agency, Inc. Respondent is the Attorney General’s Office of the State of New York. By this application, Pavillion seeks an order from this court quashing or modifying the subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum dated April 5, 2005, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- LaRossa, Axenfeld & Mitchell v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Napatco, Inc. v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ThainNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Smith v. BlavatnikCivil Court of the City of New York · 2011