Legal Opinion

Attorney General v. Bolton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1919No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Quo warranto by Alex. J. .Groesbeck, attorney general, against Edwin C. Bolton to try the title to the office of justice of the peace in the city of Detroit.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

By Act No. 475, Local Acts of 1903, entitled:

“An act to establish and provide justices’ courts in the city of Detroit, and to repeal act number four hundred and twenty-six of the Local Acts of ninetéen hundred and one, approved May thirteenth, nineteen hundred and one,”

*405—it is provided that there shall be four justices of the peace in and for the city of Detroit, who shall be elected at the regular charter election of said city or at any general election held therein, in the same man-her, possess the same jurisdiction, powers, duties and liabilities, as justices of the peace for townships,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holland v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. People Ex Rel. Wexford County Prosecuting Attorney v. KearneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ball v. Trenton City ClerkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Benson v. WilliamsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People Ex Rel. Wexford County Prosecuting Attorney v. KearneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API