Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Wexford County Prosecuting Attorney v. Kearney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 6, Calendar 46,626PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*682Kelly, J.

Defendant was elected judge of the recorder’s court for the city of Cadillac for a 4-year term, commencing January 1,1954. An information in the nature of quo warranto was filed, challenging-defendant’s right to hold the office because he was not a qualified attorney authorized and licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan, as required by Local Acts 1895, No 429.

The main question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding and entering-judgment that:

“The legislature could not, by Local Acts 1895, No 429, lawfully attach qualifications to the office of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex. rel. Hughes v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  2. People ex rel. Hoyne v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sheehan v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Nichols v. Judge of Superior CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Streeter v. PatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Okrie v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Barrow v. Detroit MayorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Stokes v. Clerk of Monroe County CanvassersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. McDonald v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People Ex Rel. Wexford County Prosecuting Attorney v. KearneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API