Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Polecat Drainage District

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1904PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Coles county; the Hon. T. N. CoEER, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was a petition filed by the appellee drainage district under the provisions of the Eminent Domain act, for the condemnation of the right of way for the ditch of the drainage district in the bed of a natural water-course, across the right of way of the appellant company at two points. The appellant filed a cross-petition, asking for an assessment in its favor for damages to property not faken. A hearing resulted in an order granting the relief prayed for in the petition, at petitioner’s cost, on the payment to the appellant company of the sum of $40 for the property taken and the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Figge v. RowlenIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Wabash Railroad Co. v. Coon Run Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Osborn v. People ex rel. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Poole v. City of KankakeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People Ex Rel. Tuohy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Smith v. Claussen Park Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State Public Utilities Commission ex rel. Noble Telephone Co. v. Noble Mutual Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People ex rel. Heise v. MunroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API