Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Clem

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1925No. Civil No. 2224PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Jessie Clem, appellee, brought this action against the city of Phoenix, for damages for personal injuries, alleging that on January 2, 1922, while the defendant was constructing a water-main at the intersection of Ninth Avenue and Washington Street “a portion of the trench . . . was . . . left ... in an uncovered condition, leaving a large hole in said street, and that said city . . . failed and refused to provide or to station a light at said hole, or to give notice of danger to the public and to vehicles passing along said street, of the said uncovered ditch or trench,” and that, while she…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kelleher v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Nesbitt v. City of GreenvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Durazo v. AyersArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Klatt v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Phoenix v. MayfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API