Legal Opinion

Duett v. Warden, Noble Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 24, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00725Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI MICHAEL DUETT, Petitioner, : Case No. 1:19-cv-725 - vs - District Judge William O. Bertelsman Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz WARDEN, Noble Correctional Institution, : Respondent. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS This habeas corpus case, brought pro se by petitioner Michael Duett under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is before the Court for decision on the Petition (ECF No. 1), the State Court Record (ECF No. 8), the Return of Writ (ECF No. 9), and Petitioner’s Traverse (ECF No. 10). The Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API