Legal Opinion
Rose v. Harbor East, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 5, 2013No. CV-13-327PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.
| Appellant Steve Rose appeals from the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment to separate appellees Harbor East Property Owners Association (“the POA”) and Recreational Management, Inc. (“Recreational”), and dismissing Rose’s complaint for foreclosure with prejudice. On appeal, Rose asserts (1) that the POA and Recreational were estopped from collaterally attacking Rose’s order of revivor because it was not void; (2) that the requirements of Arkansas Code Annotated § 16-65-501 (Repl.2005), pertaining to writs of scire facias, were satisfied; (3) that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First National Bank of DeWitt v. CruthisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Coleman v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Hardin v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Hooper v. WistSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. Dayong YangSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Worsham v. BassettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- JAMES WILLIS SUTTON, JR.; HOMER WILLIS; AND LOUIS WILLIS, EACH IN HIS OWN RESPECTIVE INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY v. JERRY D. PICKETT AND JUDY K. PICKETT, MARRIED PERSONsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- Ward v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.