Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 19, 1968No. 366-64Published

1DissentSkelton, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. I think that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be granted, because (1) the 18-month period of the contract during which the government could issue orders (calls) under the contract began March 12, 1961 (the day after the contract was approved), and terminated September 11, 1962; (2) the orders (calls) 8, 9, and 10 in controversy here were all issued by the government during such 18-month period; (3) the calls were effective on the days, respectively, they were issued and mailed by the government to the plaintiff; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stringer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  2. A. R. F. Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API