Legal Opinion

In re Roman

New York City Family Court

Decided April 18, 1978PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Raymond J. Barth, J.

The above-captioned proceeding came before this court on February 1, 1978, at which time respondent, Joe Payne, submitted a motion to dismiss the petition as to him on the grounds that the petition failed to allege an offense cognizable by this court and that sections 1012 and 1046 of the Family Court Act are unconstitutional. The court was informed by letter that the Solicitor General would not file an answer or appear in connection with the constitutional challenge.

This article 10 proceeding was commenced on April 26, 1977 by the petition of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Matter of Philip M.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In re Maureen G.New York City Family Court · 1980
  4. In re Declaring C.L.R.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In re Lydia C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API