Legal Opinion
Industri & Skipsbanken A/S v. Levy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 1995No. 95 Civ. 0137 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Industri & Skipsbanken A/S (“I & S” or “the Bank”) has moved under Rule 56 Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to enforce the guaranty of the Defendants Andrew A. Levy (“Levy”) and Ragnvald Gabrielsen (“Gabrielsen”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Levy has cross moved under Rule 12(b)(7) and Rule 19, Fed.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the complaint for failure to join necessary parties or, in the alternative, under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, or to stay this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tara Cartier Donald Coates v. Paul D. Lussier, Individually and in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Burtnieks v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Delaware Trust Co. v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Marine Midland Bank v. Portnoy (In Re Portnoy)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996