Legal Opinion

Ennix v. Clay

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1986PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

This action arose out of the collision of three vehicles on Interstate 40, and involved numerous claims, counterclaims, and cross-claims among those involved. The trial judge, over objection, ordered that

this trial be bifurcated and the evidence limited to the issues of liability only and that the cause be submitted to the jury on the issue of liability only in each case, then, should the jury find liability in any case and for any plaintiff, the damage aspects of the respective case will be submitted immediately to the same jury for a determination.

A verdict was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Perkins v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bowen v. CONSTRUCTORS EQUIPMENT RENTAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Harbison v. Briggs Bros. Paint Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Shoney's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. State v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re Simon II LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  4. Orlando Residence, Ltd. v. Nashville Lodging Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Arvil Holt, et a v. Zula PartonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API