Legal Opinion
Zimmer-Hatfield, Inc. v. Wolf
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided February 18, 1994No. Civ. A. 6:93-0537PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Plaintiff brought this action seeking injunctive and monetary relief for the alleged violation of a restrictive covenant not to compete on the part of the Defendant, a former employee. The Defendant asserts two basic reasons in support of his motion: (1) the Court lacks jurisdiction over this case because the amount in controversy is less than $50,000.00 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); and (2) the restrictive covenant is unreasonable and overbroad.
I
JURISDICTION
The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adkins v. GibsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- Luna v. Kemira Specialty, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Mailwaukee Mailing, Shipment & Equipment, Inc. v. Neopost, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003