Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Greyhound Corporation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 24, 1959No. Civ. A. 10312PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge,
This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been due to the negligence of the defendant. The case was permitted to go to the jury which found a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $5,000. The defendant having moved for a directed verdict in its favor at the conclusion of the case, has renewed the motion now for a judgment in favor of the defendant n. o. v., but without also moving for a new trial.
By written opinion filed in the case July 10, 1959, D.C., 175 F.Supp. 14, I entered an order granting the defendant’s motion for judgment in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ortiz v. Greyhound Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- United States v. WarringDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
3Cited by18 opinions
- Olen (Allen) Lee v. Nathan Habib, Olen Lee v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Norvin G. Maloney, Jr. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Melvin Perkins v. Samuel Cingliano, SrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Selle v. GibbDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.