Conrad v. Conrad
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 130 (____)
4 Dall. 130
J. Conrad
versus
Conrad et al. Administrators of G. Conrad.
Supreme Court of United States.
C. Hall, C. Smith, and Hartly, for the plaintiff.
J. Smith, Duncan, and Tilghman, for the defendant.
By the COURT:
This is an action to recover damages, for the non-conveyance of 100 acres of land, agreeably to an express promise of the intestate; with respect to which the evidence certainly supports the declaration. Considering, however, the relation of the parties, the other parental obligations of the intestate, and the extent of the property, it would seem rather excessive to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stansbury v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stansbury v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
- Flynn v. CronikenNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Sherman v. KitsmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827