Legal Opinion

Conrad v. Conrad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1793PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 130 (____)

4 Dall. 130

J. Conrad

versus

Conrad et al. Administrators of G. Conrad.

Supreme Court of United States.

C. Hall, C. Smith, and Hartly, for the plaintiff.

J. Smith, Duncan, and Tilghman, for the defendant.

By the COURT:

This is an action to recover damages, for the non-conveyance of 100 acres of land, agreeably to an express promise of the intestate; with respect to which the evidence certainly supports the declaration. Considering, however, the relation of the parties, the other parental obligations of the intestate, and the extent of the property, it would seem rather excessive to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stansbury v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1793

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stansbury v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  2. Flynn v. CronikenNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Sherman v. KitsmillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API