Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Marks

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1793PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 130 (____)

4 Dall. 130

Stansbury

versus

Marks.

Supreme Court of United States.

By the COURT:

The evidence is clearly admissible. Under the general issue, however, the jury may decide, whether the evidence is sufficient to discharge him, or not. The position is generally true, that an infant can only bind himself for necessaries; yet, in the Court of Chancery, cases occur, in which a payment would be decreed, contrary to the strict rule of the common law. In this form of action, equity is the principal consideration; and, from necessity, the Courts of law, in Pennsylvania, adopt the principles…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1793

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1793

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API