Legal Opinion

Roe Roofing, Inc. v. Lumber Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 1984No. 16-82-01066; CA A28918PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

In this action at law for breach of implied warranty, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged that plywood it received from defendant was not fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. ORS 72.3140(2)(c). As an affirmative defense, defendant alleged that plaintiff had failed to install the plywood properly. Defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in instructing the jury that defendant had the burden of proving plaintiffs damage was caused by improper installation; (2) in failing to instruct the jury that plaintiff had the burden to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Myers v. Cessna Aircraft CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Portland Ex Rel. Donohue & Fleskes Corp. v. Hoffman Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc. v. Clackamas Water District No. 2Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Layton Manufacturing Co. v. Dulien Steel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Moore v. Underwood Memorial HospitalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portland General Electric v. Hershiser, Mitchell, Mowery & DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API