Sarfati v. Antigua & Barbuda
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the District Court’s judgment of February 7, 2013, and its order denying reconsideration of May 16, 2013, be affirmed.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, summary judgment for Antigua and Barbuda was proper because there is no genuine dispute of material fact concerning whether Sarfati’s breach of contract claims under New…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Patton Boggs, LLP v. Chevron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- GSS Group Ltd. v. National Port AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Green v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kremen v. BrowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sarfati v. Antigua and BarbudaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013