Baker v. Hall
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Neosho District Court. At the July Term, 1882, of the district court, Hall obtained an order setting aside a sheriff’s sale of certain real estate made to Baker, and confirming a sheriff’s sale thereof to himself, in an action then pending in that court, wherein Baker was plaintiff and Whitman and two others were defendants. These orders Baker, and Whitman and wife, bring here for review. The opinion contains a full statement of the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
statement of facts. On July 1,1878, John W. Whitman and Elizabeth Whitman his wife executed to Smedley Darlington a note and mortgage upon certain land situated in Neosho county,'Kansas. This note and mortgage were afterward transferred by Darlington to J. M. Baker. On January 4, 1879, Whitman and wife executed a deed for the land to David Cassidy — Cassidy by the terms *619of the deed to take the land subject to the note and mortgage. On November 18,1880, a judgment was rendered on the note and mortgage in favor of Baker and against Whitman…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. LeclaireSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Toler v. AyresTexas Supreme Court · 1846
- Clamorgan v. O'Fallon & LindellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
- Lyster v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pappe v. American Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Hubbard v. MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Hubbard v. MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916