Legal Opinion
City of Auburndale v. State Ex Rel. Landis
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 28, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. Curiam.
The questions as stated by Plaintiff in Error in its brief are as follows:
“Question One: May the defense of laches and acquiescence be raised by demurrer to the Information where the Information does not show that the Charter was not legally enacted or that, on its face, the Charter Act violates the Constitution or public or private rights, where the Information shows a lapse of time of over ten years during which no suit has been filed to oust the City of jurisdiction of the property in question?”
“Question Two : Where, in a prior suit, only a part of property annexed to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Landis v. Town of Boynton BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of LargoSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Town of Boynton v. State Ex Rel. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tappy v. State ex rel. ErvinSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- City of Coral Gables v. State Ex Rel. GibbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Morin v. City of StuartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- State ex rel. Bower v. City of TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Town of Malabar v. State ex rel. Estate of NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967