Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1992No. 2537 C.D. 1991Published

1DissentSilvestri, Senior Judge

I agree with the majority’s recitation of the procedure and facts of the case, but because I disagree with the result, I dissent.

The majority relies on Young v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Weis Markets, Inc.), 113 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 533, 537 A.2d 393 (1988) in reversing the Board’s decision affirming the order of the referee granting the Employer’s petition for modification of benefits. In Young, this Court stated:

The employer must next show that he referred the claimant to a job within the category for which the claimant received medical clearance. Farkaly [v. Workmen’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Farkaly v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Matrunics v. Ruffsdale Coal Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API