Legal Opinion

Matrunics v. Ruffsdale Coal Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1972No. Appeal, No. 365 C.D. 1972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

This appeal from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board involves the narrow but important question of the burden of the employer, on a Petition To Modify an open compensation agreement, where the employee has recovered medically from a 100% to a 50% disability, to show that work is available. The Referee found that the claimant had made a partial recovery.

“He can do light work of a general nature if the job involves only moderate walking and carrying of objects or where the work involves a handing out of supplies from a storeroom. He could be an elevator…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Don-Mark Realty Co. v. MilovecCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Kelly Steel Erectors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API