Lumber Co. v. . Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentBrown, J.
J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. PLAINTIFFS' APPEAL. After stating the case: The right of the plaintiffs to recover depends upon the true location of the first line of Grant No. 3290, that is, as to land described in the grant which is not covered by any of the inside patents. The question as to the effect of the latter upon the rights and interests of the parties is presented by the defendant's appeal, and need not be considered here.(87) The contention of the plaintiffs is that the first line of that grant should be from A to B, as shown on the court map, while the defendants say…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- White v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Davis v. RainsfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
- Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. StarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Thompson v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Daughtridge v. Tanager Land, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Green v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.