Legal Opinion

Thompson v. . Buchanan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 12, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.

1. Are declarations of a. deceased owner of land as to the beginning corner, made during the period of his ownership, competent against those claiming under him?

2. Are the declarations of such deceased owner, made after he had parted with his title, competent against those who claim under him?

It appears from the evidence that Pat Abemethy owned an interest in the land or a mineral interest in it up to 7 September, 1909, and that on that day he conveyed his interest to one of the plaintiffs. It does not appear when Abernethy acquired the interest. The defendants offered testimony to the effect…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Singleton v. . RoebuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Roe v. . JourneganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. Sullivan v. . BlountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Bryant v. . CarrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. McKay v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Dill-Cramer-Truitt Corp. v. . DownsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API