Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1915No. 3421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was indicted charged with pandering, under that clause in the statute defining the offense thus: “by abuse of any position of confidence or authority procure a female to become or remain an inmate of a house of ill-fame, or to enter a place wherein prostitution is encouraged or allowed.” The indictment follows the language of the statute, and the court did not err in overruling the motion to quash it. It was not necessary to allege in the indictment the specific house. Sprague v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 837; Lowe v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 34.

The bill of indictment in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sylvester v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Morris v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Torres v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1987
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Dollar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Winterman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API