Miller v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] William Cossey Miller claims the district court erred by revoking his probation because there was no showing that his violations of the probation conditions were wiliful. We conclude the record supports the district court's decision and affirm.
ISSUE
[¶2] Mr. Miller states the issue on appeal as:
Did the court commit reversible error by failing to make a finding of willful violation *744of probation and by abusing its discretion in basing a probation revocation on events beyond the control of a probationer?
The State presents a similar issue, although it is phrased in more detail.
FA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Schiefer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Kupec v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell Robinson, Jr. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Brumme v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Michael Angelo Sena, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Barry Josef Stroble v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Bazzle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.