Legal Opinion

Venice v. Frazier Davis Const. Co.

District Court, Canal Zone

Decided December 23, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 3048PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANCOCK, District Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiff Venice against Frazier Davis Construction Company and MacDonald Construction Company to enforce payment under a written contract wherein the use of steel beams was rented, and as claimed, that contrary to such contract some of the steel was not returned and other steel was returned in a damaged and unusable condition.

The defendant Frazier Davis Construction Company is not before the Court by process or appearance, and the proceedings have been prosecuted alone against the MacDonald Construction Company. Prior to November 10,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Peterson Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
  2. Kaye v. M'DivaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Rainbow Petroleum Co. v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LIGHT v. Lend Lease Transportation Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Terminal Warehouse v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API