Legal Opinion
United States v. Estrada
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1971No. Nos. 25901, 25938, 25945, 25924 and 26023PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Shyne, Estrada, Jacobo, Richard Robles, and John Robles, together with codefendants Marratto and Gonzalez, were tried under a one-count indictment charging them with conspiring from an unknown date until about February 13, 1968, to smuggle heroin and cocaine into the United States from Mexico in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174. The jury found appellants guilty as charged; mistrials of their co-defendants were declared after the jury failed to reach a verdict with respect to them.
We reverse the convictions of Shyne, Estrada, and Richard Robles…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. Flaherty, United States of America v. James R. Kearns, Jr., United States of America v. Stuart H. WahlCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971
- United States v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Itel Capital Corporation, a Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Cups Coal Company, Incorporated, a Corporation and Herman Mulvehill, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.