Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wakefern Food Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 2006No. 535 EDA 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Clark filed a slip-and-fall action for injuries she allegedly suffered at a Shop Rite store. She appeals from the denial of her motion to amend the complaint to correct the name of the corporate owner of the store and the consequent dismissal of her complaint on statute of limitations grounds. We believe the refusal to amend the complaint was error and therefore, reverse.

¶ 2 In this case:(a) the defendant store was served under the name of Shop Rite, which is its “corporate name” under Pa.R.C.P. 2176, as it is the name under which the corporate entity that owns the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Powell v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Waugh v. Steelton Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Hoare v. BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PENN.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Montanya v. McGonegalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dandridge, D. v. Northeast Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Erie Insurance Ex. v. United Services Auto, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
  3. Flanagan, B. v. Mine Run, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Flanagan, B. v. Mine Run, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Ryan, G. v. PPL CorporationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API