Legal Opinion

Hannan v. Moran

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued for commissions for bringing about bargains for the purchase of certain property in Detroit at defendant’s request. The bargains were not ■carried out by defendant. Plaintiff recovered commissions for a single sale. Defendant brings error.

The errors assigned all go to the claim that there was no such service shown to be rendered as would entitle plaintiff to recover. If there was any Such case made out, we *262do not see but that all of defendant’s assignments must fall. The court below did not differ materially with him on the law, and no error that he could complain of was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. WheelerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Harris v. Van VrankenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Robinson v. ParhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  4. Harger v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API