Legal Opinion

Harger v. Watson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1913No. Docket No. 16Published

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Edwin S. Harger against William C. Watson for broker’s commissions. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover a commission claimed by him to have been earned in obtaining a purchaser for defendant’s hotel property in the city of Pontiac, known as the Hodges Hotel property, and also to recover $29 paid for an abstract of title to such property. The defendant resides in Pasadena, Cal., and all communications between the plaintiff and the defendant with reference to the property were in writing in the form of letters and telegrams. At the close of the evidence, the defendant’s counsel requested the court to instruct the jury to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hannan v. MoranMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hunt v. SeymourSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API