Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 1992No. 1910648PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The State of Alabama petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari after the Court of Criminal Appeals had refused to allow the State to file an application for rehearing on the ground that that court no longer accepted applications for rehearing on "intervening remands," i.e., orders remanding the cause but not making a final determination of it. We granted the writ to review that decision. We now reverse and remand.

The following legal questions are presented:

1. Did the Court of Criminal Appeals err in refusing to accept the State's application for rehearing on the ground that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ex Parte PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  2. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Ex Parte ClemonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API