County of Lake v. Cushman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hallett
The issue in the case is whether a poultry hatchery is an “agricultural use,” or, stated otherwise, whether the County of Lake can under its zoning ordinance prevent the defendant landowner from building a poultry bam on his 3.09-acre lot in view of the express provision of an act relating to county zoning barring any county regulation, other than set back, of structures used or to be used for “agricultural purposes.” The trial court held that it could not. We agree and affirm.
On August 13, 1974, the defendant Carl W. Cushman applied for a permit for the construction of a poultry bam on a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fidler v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Florida Industrial Commission v. Growers Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Murrell v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- United States v. Turner Turpentine Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- County of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Helmke v. BD. OF ADJ., CITY OF RUTHVENSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Tuftee v. County of KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- County of Knox Ex Rel. Masterson v. Highlands, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Nielsen v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.